The Senses of Preaching. By Thomas G. Long. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1988. 99 pages.  

These four essays are “a wide-ranging, collegial exploration of some critical issues in the art of preaching.” Their conversational style indicates their origin as lectures (at Columbia Theological Seminary).  

Long writes about four senses of preaching: the nature of preaching (its eyes), the making of sermons (its voice), the listener’s involvement (its ears), and worship as the context of preaching (its embodiment). Along the way he offers judicious comments on several key issues.  

Amidst the current „emphasis on narrative preaching, Long reminds us that sermons must also offer interpretation of the narrative. Bare narration is inadequate.  

He suggests that sermons should have a balanced aim. A preacher should hope that at the back door his hearers will say, “I learned something today. I was moved by what you said, and I intend to do something about it.” Instruction, emotional involvement, and impetus to action— that’s a worthy goal.  

Long acknowledges that “responsible preaching is hard work performed under pressure,” but reminds preachers that the highs and lows of pulpit performance reflect the nature of the Christian life. Christianity is not all peak experiences, yet people still believe. The hearers attend worship regularly the same way that they check their mailboxes daily. Some days the box is empty. Often the mail is addressed “Occupant.” But some days they find a personal note, sent with their name on it. Both preacher and hearers come with expectancy, knowing that there may be something from God today.  

There are also worthy suggestions here about the importance of introductions and transitions in communicating effectively. The chapter on worship urges taking worship both seriously and with a grain of salt. Excellent planning and execution can enhance worship, but it can neither guarantee God’s presence nor substitute for it.  

Long has written an engaging, pleasantly anecdotal group of essays. Discussing these issues under the rubric of the “senses of preaching” did not enhance the presentation for me, but others may find it helpful. Regardless, the essays can be enjoyed for their insight, balanced judgment, and congenial tone.